This page was archived on 16/08/2006 and is no longer being updated.
In September 2005, more than 170 heads of state and government met in New York for a summit originally conceived as a review of progress on the MDGs. Renamed "The World Summit", the event unfortunately strayed from its original purpose
In September 2000, in a flood of millennial optimism, more than 150 heads of state at the UN’s Millennium Summit in New York set themselves eight goals to tackle poverty, including an overarching target to halve world poverty by 2015 - The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).
> Find out more about the MDGs
Five years later, the international community met in New York once again from September 14-16.
But this summit, initially conceived to review progress towards the MDGs, was renamed, a host of new issues were added to the agenda, and the conference strayed from its original purpose.
We will spare no effort to free our fellow men, women and children from the abject and dehumanizing conditions of extreme poverty
The agenda was based on an achievable set of proposals outlined in March by Secretary-general Kofi Annan in his report In Larger Freedom (available to view here ), which addresses three key freedoms:
The Millennium Development Goals are the most broadly-endorsed and globally accepted benchmarks of development progress in history. But, far from ‘sparing no effort’, the world has actually allowed progress to slip.
A serious commitment to the MDGs will mean rich nations agreeing to increase aid, cancel debt, and rewrite unfair trade rules - the key aims of the Make Poverty History campaign
Developing countries have written their own national strategies to help meet the MDG targets, and also become more accountable and transparent. Rich nations have a responsibility to help them.
UN members were urged to sign a comprehensive convention against terrorism, and a Peacebuilding Commission was proposed to support countries in transition from armed conflict to lasting peace, and reduce risk of war.
CAFOD believes this is largely positive. However the proposal did not mention the vital role of civil society groups in peacebuilding.
Leaders should not allow the conference to shift towards a narrower focus dominated by terrorism and questions about the possible proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The most dangerous weapon of mass destruction in the past few decades has been the gun
A new fund has been set up to support countries attempting to strengthen democracy, and also under discussion will be a proposal to protect civilian populations from crimes against humanity, when their government is either unwilling or unable to do so.
Also under review was the current set-up of the UN, with proposals being put forward to make it more effective, transparent and accountable.
In particular, CAFOD supports the proposal to create a Human Rights Council that will replace the existing UN Commission on Human Rights in order to make the UN’s work to protect and promote human rights more timely and effective.
This should not have been just a summit of compromises or ‘business as usual’. Ambitious steps are needed now to ensure that world leaders address the most urgent concerns of the vast majority of people in the world: poverty, infectious disease, environmental degradation, insecurity in their own neighbourhoods, human rights violations and crime, as well as terrorism.
The topics of most concern to developed countries should not have been allowed to dominate the agenda to the exclusion of all others.
Get a monthly update of all our news, events, jobs, stories from projects we support, and ways for you to get involved
Privacy statement